The IPC's work in trade negotiations is currently focused on the Doha Round of
WTO agricultural negotiations. The IPC influences the debate and informs interested
parties on the progress of the negotiations both in Geneva and national capitals through publications, seminars, and editorial pieces.
Publications
Recommendations for
the Agriculture Negotiations
In May 2002 a task force of IPC members was established to draft papers on
recommendations for modalities for each of the three pillars of agriculture in the WTO and
for non-trade concerns. In November 2002, IPC members debated and approved the modalities
recommendations.The resulting document Recommendations
for the Doha Round of Agricultural Negotiations was released in January 2003
in Geneva, Switzerland.
In June 2003, IPC members issued a statement
for Cancun Ministerial Meeting urging political leaders to use the necessary political
capital to push for a successful meeting. Despite the outcome of that meeting,
it appeared that the text issued there by Mexican Foreign Minister Luis Ernesto Derbez
will be the basis for further negotiations. In February 2004, the IPC released an
assessment of Derbezs draft text against the dual goals of furthering agricultural
trade reform and achieving the development objectives of the Doha Round entitled Twenty-Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft on Agriculture.
On June 14th, while negotiators were in the process of negotiating a
framework for further agricultural negotiations in the Doha Round, IPC Chairman, Robert L.
Thompson and Vice Chairman, Piet Bukman issued a joint-statement urging, WTO negotiators must create a solid and specific agricultural
framework that builds on the valuable commitments made by key countries.
Thompson and Bukman emphasized that the WTO agricultural negotiations framework,
expected by the end of July 2004, must go further than a simple restatement of the Doha
Mandate, agreed to at the launch of the Doha Round of WTO negotiations nearly four years
ago. They agree that recent offers from
key countries have cleared the way for negotiators to create a framework that goes
significantly beyond where things now stand.
January 21,
2003
IPC
Recommendations for the Doha Agricultural Negotiations
June 20, 2003
IPC Statement on Recommendations for the Cancun Ministerial
Meeting
February 10,
2004 Twenty Five Ways to Improve the Derbez Draft on Agriculture
June 14, 2004 WTO
negotiators must create a solid and specific agricultural framework
Other Doha Round
Publications
The IPC regularly
publishes Issue Briefs covering topics relevant to its work in trade negotiations, as well
as its international development, technology and sustainability. Issue Briefs are
are concise, practical publications - six to ten pages each - that address specific
problems and issues prompted by seminar discussions. Issue Briefs clarify the topic
addressed and, where relevant, provide specific recommendations rather than describe an
ideal situation or teach economic theory. For more IPC Issue Briefs
click here.
IPC Position Papers represent the official opinions of the IPC. They are
developed by discussion among Council Members and represent a consensus opinion. As
with any consensus document, however, not all members of the IPC agree with every
individual recommendation. Accordingly, specific statements in the text should not
be attributed to any single IPC Member. For more Position Papers,
click here.
May 1, 2003
IPC Issue Brief Number One: Revisiting Special Preferences for Developing Countries
The issue of special
preferences is one of the most challenging and controversial political issues confronting
trade negotiators n the Doha Development Round. Developing countries that produce
commodities benefiting from preferences, and developed country farmers who are also
protected by preferences are deeply worried about the potential loss of preferential
arrangements. Yet, even developing countries that receive special preferences
understand that the time is coming to being to dismantle them. The economic
arguments, coupled with trends in agricultural policy in the United States and Europe are
building a strong case for finding alternatives to special preferences. The IPC's
first Issue Brief examines four types of preferences, assesses their economic costs and
benefits, and the consequences for the international trade system. The Issue Brief also places
preferences into the larger context of economic development. The paper concludes by
recommending that special preferences evolve over time into a general system of
preferences.
August 15, 2003
IPC Issue Brief Number Two: Beyond Special and
Differential Treatment
The goal of the Doha
Development Round is to bring the benefits of more open markets to developing countries.
Yet much of the discussion about the interests of developing countries has been
subsumed under the subject of Special and Differential Treatment (S&D) - a structure
that was created in the 1960s when the needs and interests of the developing countries
were quite different than they are today. Today, the interest of developing
countries are in well-functioning global food markets, with a minimum of distortions.
If developing countries put their negotiating capital into an ambitious outcome
that substantially reduces the distortions in agricultural trade through real increases in
market access and substantial reductions in trade distorting subsidies they will derive
far greater benefits than seeking exemptions and exceptions from the WTO rules.
September 15,
2004 IPC
Position Paper Number 13: A New Approach to Special and
Differential Treatment
The original purpose of Special and
Differential Treatment (S&D) was to level the playing field and give developing
countries more time to adapt to international competition. Currently, S&D
provides few benefits to developing countries, and serves as a rationale for limited
concessions on the part of developed countries. The IPC believes that there are
positive measures that can make S&D more precise, effective and operational as called
for in the Doha Declaration. A New Approach to Special and Differential Treatment
advocates differentiating developing countries into three categories: Least Developed,
Lower Middle Income Developing and Upper Middle Income Developing Countries for
international trade. Each group of countries should undertake commitments in market
access, domestic support and export competition according to their capability.
Seminars
Agricultural Trade Negotiations: Politics and
Prospects
The political environment in
national capitals plays an important role in determining the shape of negotiating
frameworks and in giving negotiators a mandate for further reform. At the same time,
the outcome of recent disputes resolution panels at the WTO on sugar, cotton and
state-trading could have an important effect on the political environment, the policy
environment and the negotiating objectives of the instigating and target countries.
The IPC's seminar, Agricultural Trade Negotiations: Politics and Prospects, addressed
the political realities of domestic politics in the United States, the European Union, the
Cairns Group countries, and the African countries, among others; and analyzed the
potential implications of the outcomes of the Cotton, Canadian Wheat Board and Sugar
Panels.
May 17, 2004
Seminar Agenda
Seminar Report, "Agricultural Trade
Negotiations: Politics and Prospects"
Post-Cancun Briefing
A briefing for members of the press and other interested parties given by
Washington DC-based IPC Members.
September 2, 2003
Proceedings
Achieving the Doha
Development Agenda
A three-part seminar series
held in Geneva, Switzerland in summer and fall 2002 covering the three pillars of
agriculture negotiations in the WTO - Export Competition, Market Access and Domestic
Support - and on Non-Trade Concerns and Special and Differential Treatment. A summary of the proceedings of all three seminars
was published in January 2003.
June 13, 2002
Export Competition and Market
Access - Agenda
September 10,
2002 Domestic Subsidies - Agenda
October 31,
2002 Non-Trade Concerns and Special and
Differential Treatment - Agenda
December 21,
2002
Seminar Proceedings
Summary: Achieving the Doha Development
Agenda
Challenges Facing
the Doha Round
A seminar held in conjunction with the 29th IPC Plenary Meeting in
Ottawa, Canada.
May 2-3, 2002
Seminar
Agenda and Proceedings
Editorials
and News Releases
September
27, 2004 |
One-Size-Fits-All Rules for
Developing Countries Must be Altered, Say World Trade Leaders
IPC OpEdOne-Size-Fits-All
Rules for Developing Countries Must be Altered, Say World Trade Leaders
IPC Press Release |
August 1,
2004 |
Agricultural
Trade Council Praises Doha agricultural framework as sound basis for moving forward
IPC Press Release |
|
|
January
13, 2004 |
Improvements Needed in
Derbez Agricultural Draft, Say International Agricultural Leaders
IPC Press Release |
January
13, 2004 |
Moves to Energize
Trade Talks are Welcome
OpEd by IPC Chief Executive, M. Ann Tutwiler |
December
12, 2003 |
No Deal is a
Bad Deal for Agriculture News Release from IPC Secretariat |
September
16, 2003 |
Cancun: Crisis as Catalyst News Release from
IPC Secretariat |
September
4, 2003 |
Cancun Must Facilitate Substantial
Reforms in All Commodity Sectors Editorial by IPC Chairman, Robert L.
Thompson and Vice Chairman, Piet Bukman |
September
4, 2003 |
Highlights of the IPC's
Position on the Doha Round Agricultural Negotiations News Release from the
IPC Secretariat |
September
4, 2003 |
The Draft Cancun Ministerial Text
and the IPC's Recommendations: A Comparison of Differences and Similarities |
August
26, 2003 |
Ag Text Improves Outlook For Cancun News
Release from the IPC Secretariat |
June
1, 2003 |
For Cancun to Succeed, Political Leaders
Must Invest Political Capital Now French |
March
31, 2003 |
Missed
Agricultural Negotiating Deadline Unfortunate, but Not Fatal Editorial By IPC Chief Executive, M. Ann
Tutwiler, |
March
9, 2003 |
Reaping
a bitter harvest Editorial by M. Ann Tutwiler, IPC Chief Executive in
the Washington Times |
February
28, 2003 |
To Benefit Developing Countries,
The Doha Round Agriculture Agreement Must be Ambitious. Editorial by IPC Member, Per
Pinstrup-Andersen, 2001 World Food Prize Laureate; H.E.
Babcock Professor, Cornell University. |
February
4, 2003 |
¿Qué más? Article by IPC Member Luis de la
Calle,in El Universal, Mexico City, Mexico. (Spanish) |
|